
What does “being stoic” really mean? Is it someone who is indifferent, bold and courageous, and unaffected by pain and emotions? Is such a person impassive, almost robotic when faced with pleasure, pain and suffering?
As a philosophy, Stoicism was founded by Zeno of Citium (333 – 262 BC) who used to teach at a painted colonnade called “Stoa” in Athens. It has been developed over the coming centuries by Greeks and Romans and has had an important effect on Christianity. Unlike many other movements of the time, it was practiced across social lines and boundaries, where slaves such as Epictetus (50-138 AD) and emperors like Marcus Aurelius (121-180) equally embraced this current of thought.
What are the main premises of their philosophy? One can divide them into two related assumptions about the world. Stoics believed in absolute determinism. Hence, everything that happens is and was meant to occur and we have little if no influence on the outcome of events. The notions of Fate and Destiny are the two terms we use nowadays to explain this rather fatalistic view.
However, it is important to note that the Stoics believed that underneath horrible events and tragedies in life, there was a living and divine being in charge of it all. This was called the “Logos” which was ruled by reason. The “Logos” is a rational plan meant for the benefit of each person, even though at first sight we might believe it to be a catastrophe. Some person that you have relied on most of your life suddenly passes away and you feel shocked, lonely and at a loss. It is a tragic event. But Stoics claim that it was meant to happen and that it was a “good” event in disguise because now you have to learn to be more independent and stand on your own feet.
A second concept is that one should control and even eliminate strong emotions and attachments similar to the Buddhist view. We all have to die and everything has its own end. When we over-evaluate things or people, when we have a strong attachment towards them, their loss will cause us much more unhappiness and perturbation. In other words, we cannot control or change our environment, the outside world, but we can learn how to deal with our own internal mental world.
What are the consequences, dangers and benefits of the Stoic movement then? Each time period had their own reasons for following this school. To the Romans it was appealing because it gave them the necessary courage for battle. There was en even blind faith in the fact that all is planned out and that if you were meant to die in the next battle, it was how it should be. It could not be dodged or avoided. On the other hand it appealed to the Roman temper since they frowned upon being swayed or led astray by emotions, something they considered a feminine trait. The ideal was to have a clear head in times of distress and suffering so that one never lost control of oneself or the situation.
The Christians were more interested in the fact that one should devote their whole life to a higher purpose, God and the spreading of Christian ideals and virtues. As a result, there were a high number of martyrs during this period. For them, life on earth was only a temporary state and one of little significance compared to the never-ending afterlife in heaven. They endured torture, persecution, even horrible death with a sense of calm and an evident lack of fear.
There are nonetheless many dangers implicit in this view. It can create radicalism or a fundamental conviction in one’s beliefs. I have always been a fan of doubt because it gives a glimpse that things are not always what we believe them to be. Doubts in moderate degrees I consider healthy and beneficial and it protects us from falling into fallacies. To die for a higher noble cause frightens me, especially when it comes to religious fundamentalism, whether it is the Crusades or modern-day terrorist attacks.
Another drawback is that some erroneously believe that accepting and surrendering to fate and destiny implies passivity or even laziness. Some might say, it doesn’t matter whether I am proactive or simply remain idle in my life, destiny will happen anyway. There could also be a certain dangerous recklessness. I can drive home drunk and if I am meant to die, that’s how it was mean to happen. These thoughts, in my opinion, do not represent Stoicism; it is not an escape from life, responsibility or one’s duties, yet quite to the contrary.
To me, Stoicism is a life-empowering positive philosophy for various reasons. First of all, it provides us with faith in times of distress. As we say, “everything happens for a reason”, it gives us support to come to terms with many tragic events and losses in our lives. The belief in an essentially “good” universe, God, Lord Krishna, Allah with a concrete plan for our growth helps us deal with the myriad difficulties we encounter in life. Some might say that we are just fooling ourselves - and that might be true. Yet there is always a possibility that it is not make-believe or a foolish assumption and that there is a spiritual entity with good and beneficial intentions and that life is, as Buddhists and Christians claim, an illusion, Maya, or a “test” for moral virtue and fortitude.
How many times have we been paralyzed in the face of fear of rejection or simply have doubted our own abilities? Many times we find ourselves tangled up in negative thoughts that cripple us, that make us immobile. So many chances and life opportunities pass us by for that very same reason. Stoicism can teach us to become more courageous and confident in our approach to life by getting a grip on our emotions.
By not attaching ourselves to things, events and beings, we can also protect ourselves. It does not mean that we do not love them or that we have no feelings for them. There is a silent acceptance that nothing lasts forever and that one day we will have to say good-bye to this cherished being or state of life. It is our own personal reaction to events that we can learn to control.
Some are thrown into deep depression, others toy with thoughts of suicide, while other more stoically-minded people accept it with their whole being, learn and grow from it and move on. Stoicism does not mean an escape from reality; it means facing the truth while not letting it wrestle us to the ground. That is, I think, the strongest and most empowering contribution of stoicism to our lives, confronting adverse events, accepting pain and suffering with our heads held high and our hearts rooted in deep convictions. It may not be for everyone, but many can use it to improve their lives and to be prepared for everything else life, fate, destiny has in store for us.









10 comments:
hmmmm... good point... maybe i should be stoic from now on i'm way too emotional almost all of the time
Great post.
I have to say, hearing the phrase "everything happens for a reason" kind of makes me shriek. It's one of those cliches that people say when they really don't need to say anything at all. I think it acts as a pacifier for those who cannot cope with the fact that life--although painful--is no more just than it is unjust. The world is not imperfect; but perfectly itself. Nothing more, nothing less. Life is not indebted to us. But to say everything happens for a reason implies that this 'ultimate reason' is the final good. Are people implying that we're reaching 'perfection' and that's what all of these tragic events are leading to? You notice you really hear that phrase when an unfavorable event occurs, but you rarely hear it when something fortunate happens.
I also wonder if these martyrs thought much about the paradox of their deterministic thinking in relation to their religion. Their notion of fate implies that we ultimately do not have a choice, so those who will eventually go to hell were merely created so that they could burn in the lake of fire for eternity? I mean, asking this question doesn't change that fact if it is true, but it at least makes you wonder how they squared this with themselves, if they did at all.
Frankly, I can easily just deal with the fact that life is fleeting and perhaps there may be nothing afterward. This doesn't give me a bleak outlook on life--it makes me appreciate my finite time here even more.
Stoicism helps you deal with pain and troubles. It doesn't say much about avoiding pain and trouble and paying attention.
What of personal responsibility? Will not this philosophy alleviate that pesky thing called morality and what of holding someone, or yourself, accountable for your actions and the results of those actions?
Great post, please keep it up!
@ Michael Cruse:
I wondered the same thing one and I had a conversation on a blog about that very topic once, and if the blog author doesn't mind, here's a link to it: http://www.travisjmorgan.com/blog/page/2/
No, the blog author doesn't mind; in fact, he encourages all kinds of philosophical discussions ; )
Excellent thoughtful comments here! Thank you all!
I know what you mean jadedconformist, the phrase "everything happens for a reason" does make my stomach churn at times especially if it is an utterance of ignorance, resignation, or indifference. But I still can't shake off the sense of a higher purpose, or an unseen realm that eventually gives meaning to all and everything.
If all is predestined, what of morality? Honestly it beats me and I'm struggling with this issue.
Are people to be held morally responsible for their acts? I'd love to say yes, but in many cases I doubt it. Yet I do believe we have inner control and that our reactions to events is to a large degree in our hands.
Anyhow, I've been planning a post on moral responsibility, but it still needs some more research and reflection on my part. So please keep posted ; )
When I first started Yoga, I found the concept of non-attachment a very difficult one.
But I think it, and all the other things you mentioned as being "Stoic" are important to have in one's life, to a degree. It works for me.
ne of the jurors might even use the occasion to symbolically punish his own son who has not talked to him for a long time.
Does anyone know how Stoicism has been changed or diluted scince Zeno's time? I have a research paper to write and I chose to write about Zeno because he is (was) so amazing.
late comment I know, but I just wanted to add that I agree with your evaluation of stoicism, (although I am by no means myself an expert..) and think that your breakdown of the topic and expression of it was well written.
Post a Comment