Generally,
the idea that guns make us safe or safer is misnomers to start with.
Guns do not offer protection, but rather endanger us,
whereas crime and violence will continue to increase as long as guns
are easily accessible. The United States should take advantage of
this historical moment to pass laws that will limit individual access
to dangerous weapons to prevent the evident spike in terrifying,
terrible, and senseless crimes.
This
type of restriction does not affect individual liberty, the same way
a lack of access to heroin does not limit one's freedom. Since guns
do not add but only subtract from our safety, they should be under
strict control to ensure and provide us and our children with a safe
environment.
If
guns are the solution, then a country with lax gun control should have
relatively low crime and homicide rates. The idea would be that armed
people would be able to protect and fend for themselves. "Shoot before
you are shot" would be the philosophy. I don't know, call me paranoid
or cowardly, but I still prefer to have only police officers armed
instead of a free-for-all gun-toting society. A surplus of weapons does not make us safer.
Along
the same vein, can anybody really say that nuclear weapons are making
the world safer? As it was the case during the nuclear arms race of the Cold War, the aim was to produce not only the largest
amount of nuclear missiles, but the most destructive and devastating
ones. This reminds me of the scene of Crocodile Dundee where Paul Hogan
mocks his opponent about the size of his knife pulling out a much
larger and much more dangerous one. This is not just childish
behavior or a cocktail of Freudian complexes; it is downright dangerous.
The
same would apply to guns. Having "regular" guns will not be enough for
one's safety. One needs assault weapons, bazookas, even bombs to
scare off others. The world does not become safer by having more
potentially devastating weapons; it becomes more terrifying. Any such
weapons in the wrong hands can inflict much more damage than at any
other time in history.
So
the idea of adding more weapons and armed citizens into the mix to
ensure more safety from bad guys is not the solution; in fact, it
makes matters worse. As a matter of fact, having guns on and with you
(concealed or not) is making your life much less secure.
And
I am not referring to bad guys or criminals here. I am simply stating
that having guns endangers all our lives. Let us look at three
different everyday situations where guns pose an additional threat to
us, at work and school, on the road and at home.
Do
you really want access to guns at work and school? Imagine the quite
common situation of being pissed off at a boss and co-worker. We will
usually storm off in anger or, at worst, say spiteful words and get
into a fistfight (none of which I recommend if you would like to
continue working where you do).
But
many a time we actually want to slam the boss's door or punch our
co-worker in the face. Once in a while, depending on our own
threshold and control (or rather lack thereof), we may actually do
so. But having a gun would make matters much worse. We might actually
use it in a momentary lapse of reason and regret it for the rest of
our lives.
Similarly
at school, students may take out their frustration on their teachers.
The latter will always be scared of those teenagers who lack control
of their actions; it is not their fault really since their developing
brains make them more vulnerable to risky behavior. And we sure do
not want to feel the brunt of it. (This is a teacher speaking who has
seen red faces of anger on students' faces because of a deserved bad
grade. A gun in those hands would surely endanger our lives and put
our profession at risk.)
Guns
are, of course, not only a risk at work, but also on the roads. The
phenomenon of road rage affects even the most reasonable types of
people. I have seen friends with nice demeanor and perpetual smiles
on their faces turn into unrecognizable monsters when somebody cuts
them off. I have seen people in suits get out their cars and take it
outside in a fist fight. The damage done there is not as irreversible
as a shoot-down would be. And again, remember most of us are not
immune to the symptoms of road rage.
Finally,
our home front is not safer either. Guns can become accessible to our
loved ones; our children may use them accidentally or on purpose
since they can be within reach. It is hard enough to hide Christmas
presents from them, so do not think that your kids are not capable of
finding them no matter how good you think you have hidden them.
Yet
again, even we are not perfect. When we get into a dispute with our
neighbors over loud music or disrespectful behavior, it is just
endangering ourselves to take the next step, namely of threatening
the other guy. We like to show our superiority in this conflict situation by wielding a gun.
Sure,
we can defend our property from burglars. But here is a scary
thought. Since guns are easily accessible, we know that they already
have one, so we need to stack up. A better world would be one where
neither has access to it. In fact, most burglars around the world are
most likely not armed. Think of it this way: When burglars need
weapons to protect themselves from the owners, we end up in another vicious and unnecessary circle.
Furthermore,
guns increase suicide rates. The reason for this is that guns are
simply much more potent and effective. When people take sleeping pills or cut
open their wrists, there is a chance of recovery. It may be a
desperate act for attention versus seriously wanting to kill oneself,
but no matter: We can save a life by not giving them access to guns.
As
we can see, guns do no make us safer, quite to the contrary. The
reason is that we cannot trust ourselves. We are human. We make
mistakes; we engage in dangerous activities; we act impulsively. By
taking weapons out of the equation, we are making not only ourselves
safer but are also adding protective layers to the environment around us.
No comments:
Post a Comment