In the month of February, which was among other things and
events also Psychology Month, the BC Psychological Association offered two free
public talks on interesting topics related to mental health and self-help.
Unfortunately, I was only able to catch the second one of the series entitled “Being
the best version of yourself.” The quest for oneself is not only my daily bread
and butter (it has been since my early teens at least), but it is also the main
incentive, guiding force and philosophy behind my upcoming book, so I knew I
had to attend this workshop.
But I almost didn’t end up going. There were two valid and
plausible reasons for my hesitation. One, this event occurred on a Saturday
morning and since it was a bit of a commute for me, it meant I had to get up
early and have a quick and rushed breakfast with the family instead of a slow
and languid one, which is usually the case on weekends. The second reason was
even more pertinent: There was a snow storm outside, which apart from being
uncomfortable and cold would also signify delays in traffic, so I would have to
head out even earlier than planned to ensure that I would make it there on
time.
In fact, I arrived there way before time and had to idle away
my extra time with the help of a self-help psychology book on how to handle
anxiety. Finally, we were allowed to enter, and the room was not as filled as
everyone would have assumed or expected for such types of talks; many of the prospective
attendees had been most likely discouraged by the wild weather outside.
Yet when Dr. Sara David started on the importance of
acceptance, I immediately felt embraced and accepted and forgot about the
turmoil of getting there. Acceptance is the main missing ingredient in
mainstream popular thinking. Accepting yourself the way you are. This came on
the heels of me watching the moving and inspiring documentary Won’t you be my Neighbor on the
incomparable Fred Rogers. When I was much younger, I used to watch and enjoy
his program very much.
Both the message of Fred Rogers and Sara David was that you
are special exactly the way you are. Although we all supposedly know this to be
true and it may seem obvious and self-explanatory, you would need to ask
yourself two things with complete honesty: Do you indeed accept yourself
exactly the way you are, your special and unique qualities as well as your
warts and shortcomings? Because if you do not, then you would not fully embrace
and love yourself, but only partially and conditionally so.
The second question is of importance as well: Do others
accept you for who you are? By others, look at your parents, family members,
friends, teachers, co-workers, and so on. Most often, they do not, but surprisingly
there is a significant overlap between us not fully accepting ourselves and
others not doing so either.
Sara David mentioned trauma at the beginning of her talk.
Although she has personally worked with the worst trauma imaginable, from
Holocaust survivors to indigenous people whose loved ones had been brutally and
heinously murdered by the hands of serial killer Robert Pickton, we have to
keep in mind that we all in our own ways carry our emotional trauma around.
And this trauma can have various sources. It often starts
with parents who do not love and accept themselves, and then - consciously or
unconsciously - dump their own anger and frustrations onto us. It could also be
teachers who were not interested nor cared about our health and well-being and even
made us suffer in our youngest and most vulnerable years.
And finally, and equally important, it could be the
conditioning that our culture, society and nation imbues us by bombarding us
with various messages that mark and traumatize us from a very young age
onward. The latter is of quite importance especially in Western capitalist structures.
Western society and culture consistently push us to be the best we can be,
namely, to be our very best version. This has led to continuous hard work and at
times material success among individuals.
Yet there is often a fundamental and essential difference
between being oneself and being who our culture wants us to be and therein lie the
very issue and the very heart of acceptance. Western society, culture and
religion tell us from the get-go that we are not good, deserving nor worthy
enough and that we must work hard to redeem ourselves in order to become special. They all give us clear
indications and images of what is considered worthy and admirable; everything
else that does not conform to this ideal we are asked to avoid or shun.
It is rather ironic that in a system that so much praises
and prides itself upon the importance and relevance of individuality, the very
starting point implicitly denies expression of one’s full-fledged individuality
and merely accepts those who fit the mold or convention, meaning those who
conform to and match those preset and preconceived ideas. As a result, people
have been marginalized for different reasons, be they of different color,
sexual orientation or disabled. A society that is truly free and accepting
would not keep any of its members at a margin, or worse, segregate among its
own population.
Sara David’s message was first accepting yourself and then
deciding how you can improve upon yourself, meaning to get even better at who
you are or want to be. Her philosophy is based on the idea that we already have
inner wisdom, a spiritual source and light that could and would guide us in the
best possible direction in our lives, but this fountain has been polluted, in many
cases even poisoned by toxic thoughts and feelings, people and environments.
And that is exactly where our trauma stems from. We feel
inadequate, not good and worthy enough because that is what and how we have
been taught throughout our lives. Two important observations and parallels can
be made here about the Mr. Rogers documentary I saw the day before. One, it is
a foolish and erroneous accusation that telling children that they are special would
make them spoiled or directly lead to feelings of entitlement. That is
certainly not true; narcissism occurs in our society not because one accepts
oneself, but rather its opposite direction: it comes from a complete lack of
acceptance as well as festering insecurity about one’s being.
Love and acceptance are not about feeling better than or superior
to others because for a person who fully loves and accepts him or herself,
there can simply be no possible comparison. How can you compare two completely
different individual entities with each other, and why should you? Love means
accepting yourself the way you are and that you are indeed unique, while
arrogance is a denial and rejection of both love AND acceptance. The arrogant
person is driven by fear and rejection; they think they are superior to others
because inside they feel inferior. On the other hand, narcissists do not accept
anybody and use all beings, including themselves, as pawns and objects to move
around for shallow egotistical reasons.
The second observation - and this one is more painful and
disheartening in itself - is that throughout those years that Mr. Rogers preached (he was an ordained minister
after all) of love and acceptance and of being special, he himself felt unloved
and inadequate and not special at all. This is sad but not hypocritical in my
mind. It just shows how deep the recesses of pain and trauma can reach us and
how they can affect us for entire lives if we do not do something about that.
What can we do? Here is where Sara David gave us tools to
deal with and slowly undo and untangle this deep trauma inside of us. For
healing to occur, there are seven Cs that we need to build on and develop, and she
explained and elaborated them in some detail.
Most of them are rather self-evident terms and truths, but
they are of vital importance for acceptance, love, growth, and moreover
healing, so I shall name them here with some quick commentary. First off, for
any kind of substantial change to take place, we need two things to occur,
namely Calm and Clarity. Put differently, we need to act from a calm center of
ourselves and need to be clear and honest about ourselves and about our subsequent
actions. This state can be aided or achieved through meditation, visualization
or other brain and emotion-calming activities. This would then enable us to
tune into ourselves, in fact, to gain access to the most inner recesses of our
being.
The next big C would be Courage. For any change, for any
habit or automatic response or conditioning that we want to replace, we require
courageous action. Courage also signifies the willingness to face fear. In
fact, those who are courageous are not magically free from fear; they are simply
not as constrained or trapped by it. In other words, courage is not the absence
but rather the mastery of fear.
Most of us react to fear by avoiding it because it is an
unpleasant feeling and experience, but instead we need to face and deal with
those situations with courage. This again does not mean we should reject or
repress fear; instead of pushing it away, we need to welcome it. Anxious
feelings are more often than not messengers or signals that something in our
lives is amiss, is not working as it should or is simply out of whack. We also
need to get past the emotional conditioning that tells us that we are weak
because we are afraid; in fact, the very opposite is true, vulnerability is
strength, and with courage we can listen to it more clearly and act upon our
anxiety.
All this would then help us get to the next step:
Confidence. Our natural confidence often gets eroded by our thoughts and experiences,
so we are tasked with rebuilding and reconstructing our own ability to trust in
ourselves again. Reclaiming confidence is very different from being
narcissistic in that the former is not as judgmental and self-critical and
rather comes from constructive feedback that helps us grow and develop our
innate abilities.
It would then lead us to Compassion. This step is very
important because by being compassionate with ourselves, by taking care of
ourselves and treating us well, we can heal many parts and aspects of our
lives. This is an essential ingredient in mobilizing us to become the best
version of ourselves. It cannot be reached without empathy and forgiveness
towards ourselves and others.
Next, we have Curiosity. We need to be mindful and curious
about ourselves. We need to observe ourselves and our emotions because they are
essentially well-meaning messengers trying to get our attention. If we listen
to them instead of judging, ignoring or repressing them, we can make important
headway in our quest for healing.
In this case, we need to silence the critic, the remnants of
those toxic voices of our past that we have internalized within ourselves, and
we need to stay away from shaming and blaming. Instead, we need to be curious
about what is the source or the origin of any given anxious feeling, what are
the reasons and motivations for their existence, what is it that fans and feeds
them. This would lead to both discovery as well as solutions instead of
negative feelings of stagnation via blame, anger and resentment.
This combination would then unleash our Creativity, which is
important for finding the best actions and resolutions to one’s emotional
issues. Through our creativity, we may also realize the importance of the next
C: Connectedness. We can achieve close bonding with others by opening our
hearts, first to ourselves and then outwards towards others. When we are
open-hearted in this manner, we see each other with the eyes of love, and our
interactions become indeed heart-felt and are not just based on thoughts or
selfish reasons.
A person who is genuinely interested in you, feels not only
curiosity about you but is also fascinated with who you are. They will be
present for you, giving you their undivided care and attention. This is also
the main difference between a caring parent or caregiver versus an absent or
toxic one. The latter is not fully present or grounded with you, and they often
harbor cold, angry feelings. They may be physically present and supposedly they
are there for you, but it is not a nourishing or loving presence and it is
certainly not genuine or honest.
But the person who is genuinely interested in you is an
interested witness of you and your growth and will provide affection and warmth
to protect and take care of you, not to change or use you for other means or
motives. Through this, we can achieve healing and evolve and grow like a tree
by expanding our branches and leaves yet remaining firmly rooted in our own
existence.
Finally, it is most important to protect and shield ourselves
from toxic people around us. They may include family members or colleagues, but
if you are surrounded by them, their bad vibes and negativity are contagious,
even if you think you may be immune against it all. The fact remains that there
are mean-spirited and negative people out there, whether they do it
intentionally or unintentionally, is not within our purview, nor should we pass
judgment upon them. But it is still best to avoid them like the plague and deal
with them only when necessary, even if they be close family members. We should
not feel guilty about weeding them out of our lives because if not, we would
merely further hurt and damage ourselves.
To sum up, we can use the analogy of the body; we need to
release toxins and assimilate all that is good. We need to avoid and shun all
that is bad and unhealthy for our body and mind and embrace everything that is
good, healthy and nourishing for our well-being, growth and development. For
this to occur, we should use an “emotional enema” (her exact words) to erase, remove
or replace all the obstacles and hurdles that are in the way of who we want to
be. We want the best possible food, and we want to surround ourselves with positive
people, that is people who have good vibes and are kindred spirits. By being
around them, we can catch their good vibes, and they can aid us in our quest
for our true self.
Fear mongers in all their shapes and forms plant the seeds
of fear and hatred within us, but at the same time, we can ourselves plant
seeds of love and nourishment by reaching the best version of our self, which
is, in and of itself, natural and aims to connect with others in a genuine and
heart-felt way.
However, there is an element of confusion or a minor
contradiction here. On one hand, we should accept ourselves the way we are, yet
we still need to become a better version of who we are. This is misguided in my
point of view. If you can fully tap into the inner wisdom deep inside of you,
that light will guide you and there shall be no need for improvement because
you already are perfect exactly the way you are.
So why is there this constant need and drive to get better? This
is one of the problems of cognitive behavioral approaches since unlike psychoanalysis,
they do not tap deep enough into the human psyche and its unconscious drives
and motivations. In other words, they still retain traces of the conditioning
that they want to undo. The idea of being the best you can be smacks
intentionally or not of Western capitalism thinking and conditioning. Being
yourself is simply not (good) enough, you should not remain idle but keep improving
on your skills and abilities.
My point is not to dismiss self-development and improvement,
but I think that by accepting yourself the way you are and by being able or
having found the way to tap into the innermost recesses of your core being,
then you are simply perfect as YOU. You are already the best and perfect
version of yourself.
Getting there of course takes effort and diligence, but it
is most certainly worth the labor and turmoil. This is a path that I intend to
trace in my upcoming self-help book that sees the cognitive behavioral field as
a useful tool, but not as sufficient enough to uncover and unveil one’s core
self and being. But it represents an important and essential first step or
mechanism, and this informative and enlightening talk proved and underscored
this to me.
3 comments:
I liked your piece very much, no less for finding plenty to disagree with: inevitable as the world has impacted in its own way upon us, all these years, after we each started off as a singular zygote, as Rushenas points out.
I wish you success in your book, & am glad to note you are a user of self-help as well as producer! This gives you a level of authority in the genre. For myself, I'm against such texts, from principle as well as prejudice, & have expressed this in up to 12 posts on Wayfarer's Notes. But it's obviously a big market and I'm confident you'll write something powerful & original. Do you have a "compelling title"? (see my latest post on Rushenas)
We just watched a DVD of "The Banger Sisters" — Goldie Hawn, Susan Sarandon, Geoffrey Rush. Ignore the critics, they have their self-serving agenda. I think it neatly illustrates the conflict between the urge to get better and the contrary urge to express what you actually are.
Goldie Hawn hasn't turned her back on her days as a groupie, she's still wild, fun-loving and above all unrepentant. Susan Sarandon wears beige and stiffly supports her lawyer husband's political climb . Of course, there must be no skeletons in his cupboard. They have two teenage daughters, who want to be wild too. As for Geoffrey Rush, never mind watch it and see.
What I get from it is that we can choose to be thoroughly what you are and to hell with consequences; or in some society-approved way, be the best you can be. And I can't see the point of fussing about it, as if there's a problem.
But that's because I find myself swimming in an ocean of total acceptance, much more rewarding than fidgeting about everything that is wrong with the world. Of course I do intervene where I think it matters, as for example the other day when I tried my point of view on my eldest daughter, and the tight rein she tries to keep on her currently wayward teenage son. She did not take kindly to it. "I'm a mother! I must protect my son, make sure he doesn't waste opportunities, fall into the wrong company etc." I saw that it was better to let them sort it out themselves however wrong it seems to me. But I accept I was being with my daughter the way I see her being with my grandson.
At the bottom of total acceptance is total faith that what happens is OK, no matter what, unless by my kindly concern I can personally make a difference.
And from this rambling comment, I conclude with the hope that your upcoming self-help book says faith is a must if we are to survive in this wstern capitalist go-getting world without reducing ourselves to a neurotic frazzle.
I certainly do not mean faith in our own abilities or future success. That is the road to hell, not in the religious sense but something like Chris Rea's song of that name.
We need faith in life, not in our own attempts at doing.
Well said, Vincent, and Amen to that (and not necessarily in the religious sense either)! I see an interesting albeit somewhat odd parallel here between the AA Serenity Prayer of accepting the difference between what one can change and what is not up to us really as well as the Taoist Wu-Wei of doing without actually doing anything (though it is of course much harder said than done)!
Too bad about your prejudice against self-help books, but you have a point. Like any genre, it has its ups and downs and its wheat and chaff. But I hope you shall not judge my book by its genre. And yes, it has a compelling title, which I shall give away in due time ; )
Post a Comment