I have the deepest respect and admiration for
medicine. It is through arduous and painstaking research and experiments that
medicine has reached a pinnacle in our lives: The field of medicine is not only
making our lives more livable by improving quality of life and helping deal
with numerous chronic and debilitating conditions but, more importantly, it is
also capable of saving lives.
How many innumerable lives have been saved through penicillin,
anesthesia, and vaccinations, and how many more with emergency procedures and
surgeries. In many ways, medicine has moved from the dark ages of superstition,
prayer, and wishful thinking into an age where many diseases have come under its
domain and control.
There is something essentially noble and beautiful in
the fact that medicine can save lives. This is the child suffering from high-grade fever who is saved by antibiotics or another one suffering from cancer
who has been miraculously cured. The gratitude from all those who have been afflicted
with these pangs of pain and suffering is boundless. We hug the surgeons and doctors, and, in our hearts, we silently thank the researchers who made all this
possible through continuous work and effort.
Furthermore, medicine helps keep us safe. In human
history, we have had and continue to have epidemics that have the inherent
potential to wipe out strands of humanity. This has ranged from the threat and
outbreak of Ebola that has been dealt with, at least for now, through quick
emergency actions and measures, and, to some extent, the AIDS epidemic, with
the latter being now much more in control thanks to advances in modern medicine.
Nonetheless, the next silently but steadily growing epidemic is going to be
associated with obesity and cancer.
During the Public Engagement sessions that I had the
pleasure to attend some weeks ago, I was privy to important information
alongside facts about cancer. First off, we are living in a time of crisis in
relation to cancer. In his talk, Dr. Malcolm Moore, the president of BC Cancer,
gave us two definitions of the word crisis
and both strongly imply the importance and necessity of immediate action:
Crisis is both a “time of intense difficulty, trouble or danger” as well as a
“time when a difficult or important decision must be made.”
As I discussed in a previous post, 1 in 2 people in my
province will develop cancer, while 5 % of the population are already living
with a diagnosis of cancer. However, the most astounding and frightening piece
of information was in relation to the Cancer / Silver “tsunami” that is heading
our way: The number of cancer cases will increase by 50 % in 2035.
The
projected cancer burden in British Columbia will increase by 39 % from about
28,000 cases in 2017 to around 39,000 incidences of cancer by 2030. Most of
this change, in fact, more than half, will be due to the aging population of
people over 65; in other words, people living longer will significantly drive
up the diagnosis of cancer.
In fact, in the US only, 3.6 million people 85
years and older were diagnosed with cancer in 1975, but in 2016, there were
15.5 million people, while it is projected that in the year 2040, that number
would increase to 26.1 million people among that age group. Better health care
and longevity have driven up the cases of cancer, and this would represent a
growing burden on health care and society as more and more younger people would
have to support the health costs of the elderly.
This is also evident in the
lack of cancer care and facility; in Vancouver, there are currently barely enough
chemotherapy chairs available, and since cases of cancer will steadily
increase, we would need an additional 400 chemotherapy chairs by around 2040 to
keep up with those rates.
Fortunately, there are different solutions available for
this crisis. One of them is to promote and increase prevention. As more and
more people can be potentially saved from being diagnosed with cancer, the
incidents would then decrease by a significant amount. This would also mean that
there would be more availability of resources for those who shall need
treatment.
Secondly, there could be more advances in treatment.
More efficient and cost-effective treatment could then ensure that people will
receive the care they need. The current methods of treatment are mostly
effective, but they are far from perfect. About thirty years ago, very few
people survived cancers like breast cancer, but today about 60 % of patients
can survive over five years, while over 80% of children can survive.
However,
that also indicates that 40 % of adult patients and 20 % of children will NOT
survive. At the same time, some of them who end up surviving must deal with
significant side and after-effects and their quality of life will be
dramatically decreased over that time period.
Thirdly, there could be advances in research that
would not only focus on treatment but rather on the actual cure of cancer.
Since cancer is a complicated disease, and in fact represents up to a thousand
variations of the same disease, there is no single silver bullet capable of
curing all the strands of this disease. Yet through person-centered and
targeted cancer care, we should be able to successfully eradicate at least certain
cancers.
What are the obstacles then? In the first one, i.e.
prevention, there is a mix of either lack of information, misinformation, or
plain complacency. Many people underplay, ignore, or deny the active role they
have when it comes to their own health. They often blame their genes,
environment, personal circumstances, etc.
Although these could be valid reasons,
at least to some extent, we all have more control over them than we tend to
acknowledge or realize. For instance, obesity may contain genetic components,
but we could keep symptoms and potential complications under much better control
with a healthier lifestyle and more balanced nutrition.
There are various innovative treatments that have been
approved by the Food and Drug Administration (note that approval by the FDA
only means that they are safe for human consumption and does not imply
effectiveness); these treatments, such as gene therapy, then undergo clinical
trials, which are mostly funded by pharmaceutical companies.
These new approaches are using modern technology to
treat cancer in a more effective, targeted, and less painful manner. The quality
of life of patients can substantially increase, while there can also be potentially
higher success rates. Finally, if our aim is not so much alleviation of
symptoms but rather eradication of the root cause of the disease, we would have
the chance to cure significantly more patients.
Yet the biggest stumbling block comes in the way of
Big Pharma, the conglomeration and monopoly of a handful of pharmaceutical
companies. Although I had heard and was somewhat acquainted with the issue of
corporate greed in relation to drugs and medicine, the problem is much deeper
and much more systemic than initially assumed or even feared.
In my opening paragraphs, I praised the potential
healing power of medicine. But this same power can also be exploited by
money-driven and power-hungry and greedy corporations. Big Pharma is situated
firmly and squarely in the US as well as in certain parts of Europe. It is indeed
this monopoly of pharmaceutical companies that sets the drug price in the US
and decides and weaves control over the global market.
Since medical drugs are of such vital importance for
patients, the latter becomes vulnerable to an abusive system that prefers, on one hand, to drive up prices for medication, and on the other hand to restrict
research for a cure of the same disease. If a given disease can be cured, then
there would be no need for further medication, hence the profit margin of the
pharmaceutical company could essentially decrease.
The same can be said about alternative forms of
medicine as they often do not depend on pharmaceutics and are beyond the reach
and control of Big Pharma. Hence, alternative medicine is, regardless of its
effectiveness, generally discouraged and discredited in consumer societies. Although
one should keep in mind that some companies indeed do the opposite and attempt
to exploit certain people by offering fraudulent products that are ineffective,
counterproductive, and even dangerous.
Nevertheless, one of the main problems here is that
pharmaceutical companies are given free rein and have little to no regulation
in their practices. There were various cases where vital drugs had undergone
significant and unreasonable (not to mention highly unethical) increases only
to ensure higher profit margins for those companies. The fact that the US
government does not (chooses not to?) interfere due to its powerful lobbies
and their economic weight and impact has made matters only worse over the
recent decades.
The main problem is that lives are at stake and that
they could be potentially saved. Unfortunately, Big Pharma has taken a noble
endeavor and profession and turned that into a money-making scheme. Although a
certain margin of profit is more than acceptable, the current amounts are
inordinate and unreasonable. It should not cost a patient almost half a million
dollars to have effective treatment for their life-threatening disease, which
is the current charge for gene therapy. In BC alone, 300 to 400 million dollars
of a $1.7 billion budget are spent annually on cancer drugs with drug costs
ranging from $50,000 to $150,000 per patient.
Furthermore, any advances and breakthroughs in
research by universities have either been funded via Big Pharma or are taken up,
appropriated, and managed by them in form of patents. The pharmaceutical
companies would then use the research of hard-working scientists (in this, the
University of Pittsburgh has led the way over the past decade or so) to fund their
own clinical trials, which would then lead to the production of drugs and
treatments. In the end, most, if not all the major decisions end up falling
squarely into the hands of the powerful few. And in times of crisis like ours,
making the right and ethical decision is of the utmost importance!
No comments:
Post a Comment