I
am not particularly business-inclined nor too endowed when it comes
to economic transactions. Mine are often limited to buying
necessities and receiving money for work performed. The stock
exchange is a foreign language to me and rarely do I sell what I
have, least of all for profit; if need be, I merely give stuff away.
Yet
I see the benefits of business with its philosophy being applicable
to everyday life. I do not advocate for a material life with money as its
pinnacle, but there are indeed certain things in our life that
warrant a cost-and-benefit analysis, our relationships being one of
them.
Simply
put, a cost-and-benefit analysis is similar to the pros and cons on a
divided issue. They are both important assets when it comes to
decision-making. Despite having an idealistic and romantic strain, I
do not think that life's most important decisions should be made with
the heart only. Purely emotional decisions can, more often than not,
lead to disastrous results, as the saying “love is blind” is not
that far from the truth.
At
the same time, love can be so particularly elusive when it comes to rational
thought and will take flight when it feels constrained by the limits
of logic. The urge to throw all caution to the wind and to
make an impulsive decision is rather strong, such as leaving everything behind -
family, job or even country – for the sake of love and attraction
toward a particular person. This might be acceptable if we were
looking at love as a permanent force to be counted on; unfortunately,
reality is filled with break-ups and divorces despite strong promise
at first. (One only needs to look at a couch-jumping Tom Cruise
ending in its deplorable current-day crisis.)
But
I am not here to wave a red flag against love and passion - without them
our life would be bordering on dullness and even meaninglessness - but
I want to see how an economic view of cost and benefits can aid us in
avoiding Cupid's drops and pitfalls.
Some
people say that everything is political, the same way everything has
an economic root. Marriage that does not take into account the issue
of economy might suffer consequences from it. Women's rights
throughout history and in various (developing) countries nowadays
have come about largely due to the growing economic independence of
women.
A relationship in which only the husband is the breadwinner can often become abusive; the woman does not seriously consider the option of leaving her partner as she would have difficulty surviving on her own, especially when children are involved while the man is fully aware of this and can do as he pleases. Being economically dependent on another person willy-nilly limits your options and decision-making in most areas of life.
A relationship in which only the husband is the breadwinner can often become abusive; the woman does not seriously consider the option of leaving her partner as she would have difficulty surviving on her own, especially when children are involved while the man is fully aware of this and can do as he pleases. Being economically dependent on another person willy-nilly limits your options and decision-making in most areas of life.
Such
struggles in relationships have been examined by Nietzsche and
further explored by Foucault, as they look at relationships mainly in
the sense of power struggle, the question of who is dominating whom.
As an example, women may use sex as their weapon of control; yet
again money itself may open up various other avenues for the pleasure
and satisfaction of men, thus diminishing or flat-out eliminating the
sexual advantage.
How
to make the best decision when it comes to personal relationships and
marriage? Cost involves the investment the person would undertake for
the given relationship. Although I have discussed money mostly, it
can also be the investment of time or emotion. The question is how
much we are willing to invest in such a relationship, what its
profits are and how stable or prone to a crash it is.
This
way of thinking may horrify some people, especially romantics, at least at
first glance, but it can save a lot of pain and suffering later.
There are cases where people have devoted most of their lives to a
person, sometimes the proverbial high school sweetheart, only to
realize that they have wasted their life, in terms of time, happiness, and opportunities. So before one fully enters a relationship for the
long haul (or so one hopes), one needs to analyze its components
first.
How
much happiness is this person able to generate for me? This question
clearly depends on one's own definition of happiness. A life that
would be based on overwhelming passionate feelings will give you
bliss and, its other side of the coin, torment as well. Love and
jealousy are no strangers to each other. But happiness needs, again
in the sense of a long-term commitment, to include companionship.
This person may be sexy and irresistible, but will she continue to be
so in say fifteen or twenty years? What then?
However,
if your definition of happiness is broader and you gain joy from
shared activities, going out for walks, watching movies or having
talks and discussions, then your chances of feeling fulfilled or
satisfied have risen dramatically. This is the person I can spend my
whole life with and not be bored, a decision not limited to sex or
income in this case.
Then
there is your confidence in the relationship. If you think that it is
possible that the person may change later while overlooking or glossing over major flaws
for the time being, you are most likely setting yourself up for
disappointment. Nobody's perfect but you need to see what is most
important for you in terms of personal characteristics, for example.
If your partner has a tendency to cheat on others, then most likely,
you will not be exempt, whatever he or she may say to the contrary.
Then, in other words, your investment will not be safe, the same way,
you would not trust money in the hands of a business with a shady
reputation.
The
final point I want to consider here separately is time. Time is the
most fleeting and perhaps most devastating one. When we lose out on
happiness or money, there is always a manner of making up for it, of
getting it back or finding compensation. But time that has slipped
away is never retrievable and lost forever. That must be the most
devastating feeling when you realize that through a lack of insight
or reflection you ended up practically wasting your life with the
wrong person.
Therefore,
look out for signs in advance. People may change, but most of the
time, very slightly. If you notice that the person is wonderful
except when he is drunk, and he has a history of alcoholism even in
his family and ipso facto genetic make-up, my advice would be, it is
not worth
it. Sure, he can kick the habit and can sacrifice a lot for love, but
it can be deceptive as well; in other words, check if the benefits
outweigh the costs.
All
in all, decisions regarding relationships can be made following the
cost-and-benefit analysis. It is definitely not the perfect model,
but it is a reasonable one. We usually spend time debating a major
purchase since we do not want to lose out or suffer consequences, and
strangely enough our relationship can be viewed as a “commodity”
as well in which we must continuously invest (money, time and energy)
but from which we can reap significant (immaterial) benefits.
2 comments:
Very interesting Post Arash! I have been thinking a lot about this recently. Especially during the pandemic. I have recognized there is a fixed amount of willpower and also we wouldn't need charity if we could all provide mutual aid and empower each other -- which comes from relationships. Relationships are everywhere and are also not just with people, but with nature, jobs, ideas, art, and they have such a profound affect on us - but are not discussed enough. Environment, work culture! It is so taboo to have conversations like this - that spell out the inherent investment and needs of each individual. I really like your approach!
Thanks so much for your kind words, Samantha! Yes, it often comes down to give-and-take, especially in relationships. Even the best of relationships still take quite a bit of work, but there should be also a balance of things. In the words of the Beatles: "And in the end, the love you take, is equal to the love you make."
As to other types of relationships, they offer us a choice as well. There, the balance might be scaled or calibrated differently. We may engage in activities that have a high cost (time, effort and money) but that will give us rewards further down the road. The best example I can think of is education. We study, go into debt, and it may seem that there is no payoff, but in the end, we will be rewarded. There can be a long delay, but it tends to be worth it.
Finally, there are those activities that simply / only ask for our attention. It is all the beauty that surrounds us in the form of nature, music, literature, film etc. Those require our selection and attention and often little investment, but the rewards are immense!
Post a Comment