Labelling per se and on its own is neither good nor bad but
it is generally efficient. Imagine going to a nameless store that has no labels
whatsoever on any of its products. Where the heck are you at? What kind of meat
or cereal are you buying? What’s inside the given product? Does it contain any
allergens, gluten, or trans fat? And how much does it cost?
Many years ago, when I was working at a store, someone had
mislabeled the price of an electronic item. It turned out that it was at a
significantly reduced price. The person’s accidental error came at a cost for
the store, but it was an unexpected boon and surprise for its clients who
walked out smiling and grinning from end to end with the afore-mentioned item
in hand.
Now my memory is a bit hazy on this matter, but I sincerely
hope it was not an error of mine as there were times when I was not at the cash
till but was designated to price items, a rather monotonous and mindless
activity that lacked interaction of any kind. I also hope the store’s manager
does not read this. It is highly unlikely but stranger things have happened
indeed.
Hence, when it comes to labels, we want to make sure and
verify to the best of our knowledge that the information is accurate and true. As
an avid reader of cereal boxes, I found the details provided to be somewhat
educational as I would learn about the breakdown of vitamins and minerals in
relation to portions as well as how all this would change with the addition of skimmed
milk.
Yet as a high school student, I was shocked to find out that
anything that ended with -ose was essentially sugar. Why not be honest and
upfront and label it as it is without trying to trick and deceive us? Sugar by
any other name would taste as sweet, and we should not overlook, kid ourselves,
or dilute the fact that most cereals are sugary in nature and purpose.
Yet, even when labels are correct, they may have adverse
effects and repercussions, especially when they are put on living beings. The
label that most of us tend to be comfortable with and often willingly and
consciously identify with is our profession. Although it is a label that we generally
accept and perhaps embrace, we may wish to peel it off during our off times.
Yet some jobs are considered constant and on a 24/7 basis. This
applies to police officers and medics, for instance. They appear to never have
an off switch as they are constantly thinking and are always preoccupied with health
and safety. When someone is in medical distress, we call out for a doctor; when
there is a violent incident, it is police officers who instinctively act and
react often without thinking as it is their second nature.
On the other hand, we would blame either one of them on
civic and moral grounds for not interfering or intervening despite them being
off work at the time the same way we would reproach a lifeguard for not intending
to save a drowning person on their break or day off.
As a language instructor, my cases tend to be much lower stakes,
but I have been able to help tourists and foreigners with directions or with
expressing their thoughts and wishes at different agencies and offices. At times,
I may not feel so inclined – again we are not talking about emergencies or
urgent situations – and I feel only slightly guilty afterwards, but occasionally
I may not feel like helping others out despite having the ability to do so. That
should not be an issue on moral grounds though most of the time, I tend to help
and do oblige willingly.
This gets juicier and even more interesting when it comes to
psychologists. The moment you mention that profession, people tend to tense up,
hold their breath and visibly swallow. The assumption is that these
professionals may be able to see through us, read our minds, or more
realistically, infer and get information from our words and behaviors. The ones
who have secrets they prefer to keep hidden under the rug or locked up in the
closet will not feel free or willing to continue the conversation at that point.
But what I wish to express here is not just how jobs and
professions affect others but the labels that come with them and the effects all
of this has on us and on our psyche. Some of these labels seem permanent. Once you
are a police officer, you will always be one. You may say that you are an ex-cop,
but something generally remains.
An ex-doctor is something you rarely hear; we might say that
the person is not practicing any longer, but it is not something you can or
would want to just shake off. And then, on the other side of the spectrum,
there are spies, drug lords, and criminals who cannot or would not divulge or talk
about what they do for a living and must come up with lies and tales to cover
it up.
Job labels can come at a cost as we can see, yet they are,
of course, not the only type of labels we must cope and deal with. There are
labels and stigmas associated with our gender, sexual orientation, marital status,
ethnicity, nationality, age, religion and political beliefs, to name a few.
Sadly, these tend to be fixed and inflexible and are often filled and peppered
with hearsay, anecdotes, and stereotypes. There are often untested and
unexamined assumptions and preconceived notions associated with each of these labels.
Apart from the labels that we carry and that we may or may
not identify with, there are also those that we impose upon ourselves. We may
come to see ourselves as a product of them and not feel free in our choices and
decision-making. For instance, I may feel pressure to conform to the lack of
punctuality of my ethnic group so that I do not stand out like a sore thumb or
offend others who expect me to arrive late.
This is evidently a rather humorous example of the link
between label, expectation, and peer pressure; nonetheless, there are much more
serious cases and occasions where people go or feel they have to go against
their own nature to appear a certain way so that they can gain approval or
avoid and circumvent disapproval.
Labels are like fashion, and they can change, or new ones
can be created anytime. When I was growing up, people who dressed or acted
oddly or who tended not to be in conformity with the norms of society were seen
as weird and labelled rather pejoratively as “weirdos”.
Flash forward to our modern day and age, and they are not
seen as outcasts but are essentially celebrated as heroes that everyone must
accept for inclusivity’s sake; they are even put on pedestals so that others (feel
pressured to) emulate them. People may claim they are being progressive and
liberal-minded by removing all labels whatsoever but, as a matter of fact, they
are just replacing one label with another, while, for better or for worse, they
encourage discriminating and going against anything that is not weird, i.e. the
norm in this case. No, there is nothing wrong with being normal or even slightly
boring and mundane.
The one place in which labels continue to have negative
effects as they box people in and where despite goodwill and intention only
little advance has been made is that of mental health. There is an equal
tendency of completely going the other way of seeing (or at least claiming and
pretending to see) mental illness as normal, which is too extreme and harmful
both to the individual and to society at large. It is not akin to celebrating
obesity for the sake of aesthetics and inclusivity while ignoring, disregarding
or even turning a blind eye to the myriad health risks and complications that
are associated with that condition.
Although things have somewhat improved and people talk more
openly about their emotional and psychological struggles and feel generally
less conflicted about seeking help to maintain, boost, and improve mental
health, this has been of course also exploited or taken advantage of by many
and for different, often harmful and nefarious purposes.
For many, mental health has become an empty word, a slogan,
an excuse, or a political rallying cry. We are far from fully accepting it and of
taking away the stigma and label attached to it but, at least, we are more
aware of it, and it has become a topic of conversation instead of immediately
being swept under the rug or rapidly dismissed.
Labels may designate the box, but they are not the box. In
any ways, labels are just that, yet we exaggerate their importance and
relevance and feel boxed in. We are then afraid to think outside of the box but
rather feel restricted in our thinking and behavior and essentially vis-à-vis our
unique way of being. Conformity can create the feeling and illusion of harmony,
but it comes not only at an individual cost of freedom, but it is also not
something that is healthy especially if done over a prolonged time.
Notwithstanding, these same labels and boxes have now become
a meme. A meme can be anything that goes viral, that is, it is repeated on a
seemingly endless loop without much thought or consideration. It is the modern
earworm where notes seem to get stuck in our head whether you enjoy them or
not. The same way, not only images and posts can become memes but also words,
ideologies, or ways of thinking.
Not only are they being accepted and taken as is, but they
are also endlessly and mindlessly repeated until we give up and accept and
embrace them, be it consciously or unconsciously. This goes hand in hand with Nazi
propaganda claiming that for others to come to accept a certain falsehood, it
is important to bombard them with it on a continual basis, i.e. drill them with
carefully chosen and selected memes. These memes then become lodged in our brain
and are not based on critical thinking nor are they checked for their level of
truth or falsehood, but they become stuck and keep crawling in our heads like
the earworms of old.
This is not a political issue of left versus right as propaganda
and falsehoods are perpetuated by both sides on the spectrum if not at the same
level and quantity. They further undermine our freedom of action and thought
and the expression of certain ideas that soon become taboo. This leads to a
type of self-censorship and peer pressure in which many do not utter certain
words or unpopular statements out of fear of retribution or attacks.
It also makes some scientists and researchers either
willingly drop research interests due to their potentially polemic nature or in
other cases when they attempt to do so, there will be no funding or grants for
that line of research for the very same reasons. In such cases, the box is
synonymous with a noose muzzling and even killing not only research and science
but also putting a stranglehold on creativity and humor.
The consequence of all this is ironic. In a time that we are
claiming to be most diverse, we are less so. In a time when we claim to be
open-minded, we become more bigoted. In a time when we claim to stop judgments,
we are being judgmental. In a time where we claim to abolish boundaries and
combat stereotypes and prejudice, we essentially foster and encourage them.
It is more than ever important to embrace and feed our
creativity and to not let ourselves be boxed in by thinking outside of the box.
In fact, the box represents our own limits and limitations that we and others
have set for ourselves. We can choose to accept the labels and boxes, or we can
discard them and connect with who and what we truly are.
Labels are just that; they do not compare to the actual
product. At best, they would be the trailer to the movie, but you are the real
thing and are not the label unless you choose to identify as such. If it helps,
you can expand a label to become a box. That way, it would be less limiting
because a label sticks to you but with a box you have at least some legroom and
you a have a bit more freedom. Plus, boxes come in different shapes and sizes
and can be easily expanded.
And as you are considering and weighing your options and responses, you would do well to take things easy and take them with a grain of salt. Moreover, allow yourself to have a good time, to enjoy the process and the journey, and, most importantly, remind yourself to have a good laugh every now and then.
No comments:
Post a Comment