As if all
this was not enough, it evolves into a surreal movie that is a mix of Attack
of the Killer Tomatoes, The Birds, Animal Farm, and Spartacus.
Please be advised that from now on, you will be entering into a bizarro world
that for the necessities of this piece will have to include spoilers and that
will contain strange ideas that strangely enough will make perfect sense. There
will also be a political dimension to everything discussed that will not take
sides on the political spectrum but oddly enough, at least in my
interpretation, give both sides their dues while at the same time criticizing
them in equal measure.
Moreover,
oddly enough animal lovers and rights activists who should be eating this up
have jumped to quick and hasty conclusions and have claimed that the film
portrays and represents animal cruelty, which is not the case, certainly not
thematically nor in terms of filmmaking; to the careful and discerning eye, it
becomes clear that evident care was taken to minimize any potential harm to the
animals, while the trained stray dogs were, for the most part, adopted after
filming. Be it as it may, you have been forewarned.
I first saw
this movie about seven years ago. I do not really know why but I remember
reading a favorable review of it. In fact, it had received generally good
reviews and although it was an official selection and was sent for competition
in the best foreign movie category at the Oscars, it was not nominated. It is
one of those cases where it might have gone over the head of the Academy Award
members and/or it might have been too bold and daring to promote and feature in
that category.
The movie
starts a bit like Danny Boyle’s zombie apocalypse 28 Days Later: In this
case, a young girl with her trumpet dangling on her back is riding her bike
through empty and deserted streets with hastily abandoned cars that have their
doors wide open and without a soul anywhere in sight. Suddenly, out of nowhere
and accompanied by an ominous score, she is being chased by a mob of angry and
vicious dogs.
Flashback
to where the same girl, our thirteen-year-old main character Lili is forced to
spend the summer with her Dad, a divorced and solitary meat inspector who does
not seem pleasant at first glance. Thank goodness she has Hagen, her dog, who
is her faithful companion, but it becomes quickly apparent that neither her
father, nor nosey and quarrelsome neighbors nor society at large have any type
of feeling, affinity, or compassion for the creature. Dogs are seen as a
nuisance, especially so-called common and ordinary half-breeds like Hagen whose
designated place and fate seem to be the dog pound and animal shelter.
The
difficult relationship Lili has with her father intensifies with the presence
of the unwanted and disliked dog. As he is strongly opposed to the dog sleeping
on the bed with them, he forces Hagen to sleep in the bathroom where he barks
all night long robbing him of sleep and annoying the already annoyed neighbors.
In a touching scene, Lili gets up at night, plays notes from Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 that soothe and calm the distressed animal, and she crawls into the bathtub and
falls asleep there. The next morning, a government official appears and wants
the father to pay for a dog license. After this event, Lili takes Hagen to her
orchestra rehearsal and hides him behind a door asking him to be quiet.
For the
most part, he is until he recognizes the musical section with the string of
notes that she usually plays for him on the trumpet, and he bursts out to her
happily barking. This gets Lili into serious trouble with an ill-humored
conductor who puts her on the spot and gets her to choose between the orchestra
and the dog. Of course, she chooses the dog and leaves the orchestra without
further ado.
Without
going into too much detail in terms of plot, what happens next is that the
father abandons Hagen to his fate, and the dog ends up going on a few
adventures that become increasingly disturbing and difficult to watch. At
first, he befriends a friendly stray dog, and they are chased by dog catchers,
but then, he finds temporary refuge with a homeless guy who sells Hagen who
ends up becoming a dogfighter.
His
eventual trainer sees something special in this dog. Although the dog is meek
and friendly, there is heart and determination behind this façade, and the
trainer recognizes that potential. And in some of the most harrowing scenes of
the movie, he begins to train Hagen for fighting purposes by torturing him,
beating him, and injecting him with steroids. The practice by this trainer
is undoubtedly animal cruelty of the cruelest type imaginable, but it is
definitely not a view that the filmmaker endorses but rather something that he
exposes. And it is done most skillfully as most of it is not shown; and yet, it
still makes us shudder and want to close our eyes so that we do not see the horror
occurring in front of us.
After Hagen’s
and the trainer’s first successful fight, we see blood, but it is a bravura
sleight of hand that turns playfighting into an apparently vicious and bloody
battle between two dogs. In the following scene, Hagen suddenly realizes that
he has killed an innocent fellow dog for no reason. The acting of the dog, the
expression, and his demeanor are exemplary here, and we feel or assume that he
has woken up from pain, trauma, and torpor and suddenly realizes what he has
done. Hagen decides to escape this cruel and heartless underworld.
But this
experience, however painful and traumatic, has also emboldened him. When he is
eventually caught by the dog catchers, he suddenly starts a revolt, which turns
into a full-scale revolution. Hagen attacks and kills various people at the
animal shelter and frees his fellow stray dogs to embark upon the city. This
part of the movie has hues of Spartacus but is also a nod to B-movies
and westerns. It becomes the revenge of the canine as he tracks, hunts down,
and brutally kills all those who have harmed and done him wrong, from the
homeless person to the awful dog trainer. The last on the list is, yes you
guessed it, her ex-owner’s meat-inspecting father.
This is the
surreal part of the movie, which is also a jolting experience, basically The
Birds but with dogs. Given the emotional connection we have with Hagen, this
is not as silly as it may sound, but it does require a stretch of the
imagination and might be a turn-off for more realistic-minded viewers. In an
astounding set piece, the members of the orchestra are suddenly faced with
various dogs staring and glaring down at them from the balcony. They all stop
the music and flee in panic.
The final
scene of the movie is the most moving and I would put it as one of the best
endings I have ever seen, right on par with other masterpieces like Shawshank
Redemption. Lili soon realizes that Hagen is leading his posse of
rebellious dogs to kill her father. Yet, at this point, her father has had a
change of heart. After his daughter had almost hit rock bottom by being
arrested for drug possession – the drugs were somebody else’s and she was not
going to use them herself – her father changes his tune and becomes more caring
and attentive.
It could be
seen as a handy plot device to rouse sympathy for an unsympathetic character
but at the same time, it could also be the true nature and being of a person who
changes for the better after experiencing intense turmoil, heartbreak, and
suffering. Be it as it may, we end up not wanting him to die, and she tries her
best to save him from the attacking mob.
The
showdown and final scene happen in front of the slaughterhouse. She bravely
faces the pack of dogs and tries to talk sense to its leader Hagen. He menaces
her but she tries to win him over with soft and kind words. Does he recognize
her? Can she re-awaken those feelings and moments of tenderness that they
shared, those moments of innocent bliss together before the world went berserk?
Will he ever forgive her?
Then, she
pulls out her trumpet and starts playing the familiar motif of this film. What
happens next still gives me goosebumps as I am writing this. We can see on
Hagen’s expression and demeanor that he recognizes the melody and that powerful
memories have been stirred and triggered deep inside of his being, and he then lies
down. And with him, all the other dogs follow suit as the beautiful melody continues
and lingers in the air. Moved by the spectacle and in awe and reverence, both
daughter and father prostrate themselves in front of the dogs, and the movie
ends.
This movie
can be read and interpreted in different ways. The more straightforward
interpretation would be to be kinder to animals and treat them with empathy,
love, and respect. This message would easily resonate with pet owners, but it
can be extended to society as a whole, which often views animals as inferior
beings. It can also be further extended to using and abusing animals as food
alongside criticism of the (over)consumption of meat. The graphic opening at
the slaughterhouse and the symbolic ending at the same place certainly point in
that direction.
In terms of
political allegory, we could also consider a more communist and socialist interpretation
in which the poor and downtrodden would rise and revolt against the bourgeoisie
and take over control and power. There would be a state of anarchy, chaos, and
destruction and a time of reckoning for a long history of abuse, exploitation,
torture, and suffering.
Yet, if you
replace the poor with the meek, which is a characteristic of Hagen, then we can
even have biblical connotations of the meek finally inheriting the earth. It
is, however, not done by turning the other cheek but with the sword, as Jesus
himself has proclaimed. The dogs would be his disciples and soldiers breaking
through ignorance and hatred and taking control of their lives. Put into the
context of a more current perspective, this is a fight for freedom and liberty
where the shackles of censorship, control, and manipulation would be taken off.
I admit
that both views are wacky and extreme. Interestingly, they would condone
violence and anarchy, and I oppose both. In my personal view, revolution
founded on blood and destruction only fosters hatred as there is literally no
love lost between both sides. This is the current political climate, which will
not be resolved until negotiations, compromises and open dialogue from both
sides are engaged and are taken seriously to bridge the differences, mend
the hurts and misconceptions and find common ground.
And yet,
and by all means and purposes, this is an excellent movie that can be enjoyed
without becoming entangled in controversy as it showcases the love and bond
between humans and animals, a message that will and should resonate with each
being, first and foremost.
1 comment:
'Dream your dreams about what YOU
want to do in Heaven; dare to ask for
the impossible and all the gifts YOU
have ever wanted from Me. Expect Me
to hear YOU and fulfill your every desire'
-Jesus •(from 'Lui et Moi' [He and I] by
Gabrielle Bossi, French writer, translated)•
☆ en.gravatar.com/MatteBlk ☆
Make Your Choice -SAW
Post a Comment